Current NC School Diversity Statistics
North Carolina continues to resegregate by race and socioeconomic status (SES). Reports published in the past five years show imbalances in school demographics, teacher demographics, per-pupil expenditures, graduation rates, suspension rates, access to advanced courses, and more.
70 years since Brown
On the 70th anniversary of Brown vs Board of Education in 2024, the Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA published updated national statistics confirming the trend of resegregation nationwide. It also released a supplemental report of North Carolina data summarizing trends from 1989 to 2021.
This excerpt includes a sample of key findings from the report’s executive summary (pp. 4-5):
From 1989 to 2021, North Carolina’s public school enrollment increased by over 41% and became increasingly diverse. In 2021, the state’s public school enrollment was 45% White, 25% Black, 20% Hispanic, 5% Multiracial, 4% Asian, and 1% American Indian.
Despite an increasingly diverse student body, patterns of segregation intensified as students of all racial groups were disproportionately enrolled in schools with same-race peers. In 2021, the typical White student attended a school where 58.9% of the students were White, even though White students only comprised 45% of the total state enrollment. The typical Black student attended a school where 41.2% of the students were Black, even though Black students accounted for 25% of the state’s enrollment. The typical Hispanic student attended a school where 28.7% of the students were Hispanic, even though Hispanic students accounted for only 20% of the state’s public school enrollment.
In the past three decades, the share of intensely segregated schools of color (schools that enroll 90-100% students of color) increased such that in 2021, 13.5% of the state’s public schools were intensely segregated schools of color. In 2021, 1 in 4 Black students and almost 1 in 5 Hispanic students across the state attended an intensely segregated school of color.
In 2021, within intensely segregated schools of color, 82.6% of the students were recipients of free or reduced-price lunch, indicating a double segregation of students by race and poverty. The typical Black and Hispanic students attended a school with disproportionately large shares of low-income students (61.3% and 55.3%, respectively) while the typical White and Asian students attended a school with disproportionately small shares of low-income students (38.0% and 29.4%, respectively).
It is also common for white families to perceive that their districts’ schools reflect their community demographics even when they don’t, or to attend a school that is diverse in some ways like race and ethnicity but disporptional in others like SES.
After two decades of returning to neighborhood and school choice assignment policies, you can see in the graph below that for every category, the typical North Carolina student attends a school where their own race is overrepresented.
For example, in 2021, the typical Black student attended a school that is made up of about 41% Black students when the Black student population in the state is only about 25%. And the typical white student attends a school that is nearly 60% white even though white students make up only 45% of the state population.
Other Data
Privatization and school choice trends contribute to resegregation. In North Carolina, charter schools and vouchers are exacerbating issues of racial and socioeconomic isolation.
For example, though they only make up 45% of the NC student population, white students make up as much as 77% of private school enrollment. The graph below shows how many more white students are using vouchers to attend private schools every year.
Now that the General Assembly has removed all restrictions on vouchers and budgeted a massive increase in voucher dollars, this trend will escalate.
Using a method of controlled choice, school districts will often choose more segregated or economically disadvantaged schools to convert to magnet programs. A magnet school may still be disproportional to some extent, but the balance is much better than before it became a magnet. In the table below, note that the biggest difference between magnet and charter schools is in the percentage of students who qualify for Free and Reduced Lunch since charter schools are not required to provide transportation.
There are many ways implicit biases and systemic racism “separate” students or stifle diversity.
- Unequal access to high-quality PreK education.
- Lack of educator diversity so students of color almost always have white teachers.
- Biased discipline practices that remove students of color to ISS, OSS, alternative schools, or even prison.
- These conditions causing more students of color to be held back, chronically absent, or at-risk for dropout.
- Biased placement of more students of color in special education and fewer students of color in AIG, honors, and AP courses.
- De facto segregation of higher education due to generational inequality of opportunity and wealth
The Center for Racial Equity in Education (CREED) compiled a comprehensive report in 2019 summarizing statewide data. In the graph below, the positive and negative percentages show each racial group’s comparison with the white student group.
CREED’s detailed report compared data for white students with students in other racial categories and found significant advantages for white students across a wide variety of educational measures. (See p. 91 for a summary table of all comparisons and racial groups.)
The Flood Center’s Equity Profile Dashboard breaks down more current data by school district. For example, comparing Wake County’s student and teacher demographics in the graph below shows the racial imbalance of its teacher workforce.
Resources
Can Our Schools Capture the Educational Gains of Diversity? North Carolina School Segregation, Alternatives and Possible Gains – 2024 report by The Civil Rights Project / Proyecto Derechos Civiles (UCLA)
E(race)ing Inequities: The State of Racial Equity in North Carolina Public Schools – 2019 report by the Center for Equity in Education (CREED)
Still Stymied: Why integration has not transformed North Carolina schools – 2024 report by the NC Justice Center Education & Law Project (a follow-up to Stymied by Segregation, 2018)
Equity Profile Dashboard – from the Dudley Flood Center for Educational Equity and Opportunity, includes data taken from the NC Department of Public Instruction, NC School Report Cards, and the U.S. Department of Education since 2020
Watch NC’s History of School Diversity: Part 4: Resegregation Era (1988-Present) below
References
Ayscue, J., Cadilla, V., Oyaga, M., & Rubinstein, C. (2024). Can Our Schools Capture the Educational Gains of Diversity? North Carolina School Segregation, Alternatives and Possible Gains. https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/north-carolina-report/Can-Our-Schools-Capture-the-Educational-Gains-of.pdf
Carr, R. (2022). Research Brief: Measuring educational opportunity in North Carolina Public School Districts. Duke Sanford School of Public Policy and the Hunt Institute. https://hunt-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/HI-DukeFellows-Carr-June-2022.pdf
Dudley Flood Center for Educational Equity and Opportunity. (2023). Equity Profile Dashboard. https://floodcenter.org/equity-profile-dashboard/
McColl, A. (2024). Everything you need to know about the Leandro litigation. EdNC. https://www.ednc.org/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-leandro-litigation/
McEachin, A., Carlson, D., James Carter III, Perera, R. M., Domina, T., & Vitaly Radsky. (2023). Can school choice support district-led efforts to foster diverse schools? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/can-school-choice-support-district-led-efforts-to-foster-diverse-schools/
Nordstrom, K. (2022). Still Stymied: Why integration has not transformed North Carolina’s schools. North Carolina Justice Center Education & Law Project . https://www.ncjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/REPORT-Still-Stymied-Kris-2-FINAL-1.pdf
Nordstrom, K., & Nunn, P. (2024). How Voucher Programs Undermine the Education Landscape in North Carolina. North Carolina Justice Center. https://www.ncjustice.org/publications/how-voucher-programs-undermine-the-education-landscape-in-north-carolina/
Nordstrom, K., & Tillitski, L. (2021). School Performance Grades: A Legislative Tool for Stigmatizing Non-White Schools. Education & Law Project | NC Justice Center. https://www.ncjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/SCHOOL-PERFORMANCE-GRADES-2-web.pdf
The Hunt Institute. (2019). The Drive Summit: Developing a representative & inclusive vision for education. https://hunt-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/HI-DRIVE-SUMMIT-KEY-TAKEAWAYS.pdf
The Winston-Salem Foundation. (2022). Ideas to Action: Equity in Education. In YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_t6wjHe4ovk&t=1153s&ab_channel=TheWinston-SalemFoundation
Triplett, N. P., & Ford, J. E. (2019). E(race)ing Inequities: The state of racial equity in North Carolina public schools. Center for Racial Equity in Education (CREED). https://www.creed-nc.org/our-reports
by Nancy Snipes Mosley,
PSFNC staff member and former high school Social Studies teacher
Last updated 12/2/2024